Guernica 37
Guernica 37

Press Release: IBAHRI adopts Resolution on armed drone strikes amid major concerns of rapid increase of use

The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) has adopted a resolution on armed drone strikes, expressing concern about the secrecy of its use and the “lack of clarity and transparency as to the applicable legal framework”. The resolution is available here.

Today, the IBAHRI has issued the following press release:

The proliferation of the use of drones by states and armed groups to deliver lethal force, and the complications that this new development poses to the application of international law, are of mounting concern to the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI). This has led to the Council of the IBAHRI adopting a Resolution on their usage. The full text of the Resolution can be read here: bit.ly/drones-res

IBAHRI Co-Chair Ambassador (ret.) Hans Corell commented: ‘As the tactics employed in warfare evolve, so must our legal interpretation of the laws which govern them. The growing availability of drones to both state and non-state actors, together with their remote-piloting functionality, is resulting in a number of extraterritorial and covert attacks, the perpetrators of which are not being held to account. It is essential that the international legal community pay urgent attention to this issue, lest it be perceived as essentially sanctioning murder.’

In the Resolution, adopted on 25 May 2017, the IBAHRI expresses concern about the:

  • availability of drones that may spread armed conflict and encourage states to resort to lethal force and violate human rights;
  • lack of clarity and transparency as to the applicable legal framework governing drone strikes;
  • undermining of effective legal oversight and accountability;
  • secrecy surrounding the use of drones leading to the preclusion of appropriate investigations;
  • psychological harm reported to be suffered by those living within the regions in which drones regularly operate; and the
  • lack of required infrastructure and/or access to the judicial system for victims of drone strikes to realise effective remedies.

Further, the Resolution states:

  • The use of drones must adhere to the current law governing the use of force: The accepted exceptions to the general prohibition against the threat or use force in Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations are that force may be lawfully used only in cases where consent has been sought and granted from the legitimate government of a territorial state, or in proportionate self-defence, or with the authorisation of the UN Security Council.
  • Whether or not a drone strike occurs in the context of an armed conflict is crucial to assessing its lawfulness: International humanitarian law and international human rights law have different rules on when and how lethal force may be used. The level and type of force inherent in the use of armed drones will rarely, if ever, be lawful under the more protective international human rights law framework outside of armed conflict. It is therefore of utmost importance that the existence of an armed conflict is not lightly assumed. It must be objectively assessed, on the basis of factual circumstances prevailing at the material time.

For deeper understanding and analysis, an accompanying Background Paper to the Resolution sets out the legal framework applicable to the use of armed drones, inside and outside of armed conflict by both state and non-state actors. It details the legal context in which the Resolution was adopted and highlights the importance of adhering to all applicable international legal rules governing the use of drones:

‘Drones provide a simple recourse to force that would otherwise have been impossible, and this gives them a uniquely destabilising capacity. As the practical barriers to the use of force fall down, it is vital that the legal barriers are reinforced and reasserted.’

ENDS

Notes to the Editor

  1. To download the Resolution in full and/or the Background Paper, click here or paste the following link into your browser www.ibanet.org/Human_Rights_Institute/council-resolutions.aspx
  2. The International Bar Association(IBA), established in 1947, is the world’s leading organisation of international legal practitioners, bar associations and law societies. Through its global membership of individual lawyers, law firms, bar associations and law societies it influences the development of international law reform and shapes the future of the legal profession throughout the world.

    The IBA’s administrative office is in London, United Kingdom. Regional offices are located in: São Paulo, Brazil; Seoul, South Korea; and Washington DC, United States, while the International Bar Association’s International Criminal Court and International Criminal Law Programme(ICC & ICL) is managed from an office in The Hague, the Netherlands.

    The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute(IBAHRI), an autonomous and financially independent entity, works to promote, protect and enforce human rights under a just rule of law, and to preserve the independence of the judiciary and the legal profession worldwide.

For further information, please contact:

Romana St. Matthew – Daniel
Press Office
International Bar Association
4th Floor, 10 St Bride Street,
London EC4A 4AD

Mobile: +44 (0)7940 731 915
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7842 0094
Main Office: +44 (0)20 7842 0090
Fax: +44 (0)20 7842 0091

Email: romana.daniel@int-bar.org
Website: www.ibanet.org


The press release is also available at IBAHRI’s webpage: https://www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=edb0388d-bc39-461f-a282-eadea11f42bd

More News

  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-26 a las 16.37.41 Toby Cadman participates in the debate “Libya peace talks – can they deliver?”

    Toby Cadman participates in the debate “Libya peace talks – can they...

    Read Story
  • US_Department_of_State_official_seal State Dept. Office of Global Criminal Justice on the Chopping Block–Time to save it

    State Dept. Office of Global Criminal Justice on the Chopping Block–Time to...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-04-11 a las 18.06.08 New York Times: “Spain Court Drops Complaint Against Syrian Security Forces”

    New York Times: “Spain Court Drops Complaint Against Syrian Security...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-21 a las 22.17.46 Report: Voices from the Dark. Torture and Sexual Violence Against Women in Assad’s Detention Centres

    Report: Voices from the Dark. Torture and Sexual Violence Against Women in Assad...

    Read Story
  • microphone-1007154_640 Interview: Toby Cadman analyses the war crimes case filed against Syrian officials before German courts

    Interview: Toby Cadman analyses the war crimes case filed against Syrian...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-21 a las 11.11.42 CNN: “The torture survivors suing the Syrian regime”

    CNN: “The torture survivors suing the Syrian regime”

    Read Story
  • Processed with VSCO with hb1 preset Statement of Former US Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Stephen Rapp on the Proposed Elimination of the Office of Global Criminal Justice

    Statement of Former US Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Stephen Rapp on the...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-18 a las 18.55.28 Guernica37 files preliminary inquiry to investigate Mr. David Haigh’s torture in United Arab Emirates

    Guernica37 files preliminary inquiry to investigate Mr. David Haigh’s...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-12 a las 13.37.03 Press Release: IBAHRI adopts Resolution on armed drone strikes amid major concerns of rapid increase of use

    Press Release: IBAHRI adopts Resolution on armed drone strikes amid major...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-12 a las 12.17.06 Estreno del documental “Eye of the Lammergeier” sobre el genocidio contra el pueblo tibetano

    Estreno del documental “Eye of the Lammergeier” sobre el genocidio contra el...

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-10 a las 10.09.16 The State of Qatar: Sovereign Nation or a Vassal State

    The State of Qatar: Sovereign Nation or a Vassal State

    Read Story
  • Captura de pantalla 2017-07-05 a las 15.26.28 IONO fm: “UK activists demand end to Saudi Arabia, UAE arms sales”

    IONO fm: “UK activists demand end to Saudi Arabia, UAE arms sales”

    Read Story